2026 WATER QUALITY RECORDS
South Carolina Water Quality: 73 Cities Ranked by the Records
Water quality across 73 cities in South Carolina, drawn from EPA drinking-water records. Each city page shows the measured contaminants and a reproducible Purity Score.
- city reports ranked
- 73
- cities with a past health-based violation
- 5
- cities with PFAS above the federal limit
- 35
- cities with lead above the action level
- 0
South Carolina cities ranked by the records
73 cities, highest Purity Score first
- 1Greenville (sc2310001)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 2Spartanburg100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 3Spartanburg (sc4210001)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 4Greer Cpw (sc2310005)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 5Inman Campobello W D100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 6Electric City (sc0410012)100/100Past total coliform bacteria violation on record
- 7Easley Combined Util (sc3910002)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 8Fort Mill Town (sc4610003)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 9Lcf District (sc4220010)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 10West Anderson W D100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 11Marco Rural (sc3320001)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 12Pioneer Rural Dist (sc3720001)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 13Walhalla City (sc3710004)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 14Big Creek W S District100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 15York City (sc4610001)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 16Tega Cay City (sc4610008)100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 17Sumter City (sc4310001)99/100No PFAS detected; lead 0.79 µg/L
- 18Aiken City (sc0210001)99/100No PFAS detected; lead 0.82 µg/L
- 19Walterboro99/100No PFAS detected; lead 0.74 µg/L
- 20Rock Hill98/100No PFAS detected; lead 2 µg/L
- 21Rock Hill City (sc4610002)98/100No PFAS detected; lead 2 µg/L
- 22Darlington County W Sa (sc1620001)98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.6 µg/L
- 23North Augusta City (sc0210003)98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.7 µg/L
- 24Chesterfield Rural (sc1320003)98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.7 µg/L
- 25Laurens Cpw (sc3010001)98/100No PFAS detected; lead 2 µg/L
- 26Edgefield W Sa97/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.1 µg/L
- 27South Island Psd (sc0720001)97/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.1 µg/L
- 28Six Mile W/D (sc3920002)97/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.11 µg/L
- 29Seneca City (sc3710002)96/100No PFAS detected; lead 3 µg/L
- 30York County East Wd (sc4620002)96/100Past total coliform bacteria violation on record
- 31Sandy Springs (sc0420003)96/100No PFAS detected; lead 3 µg/L
- 32Lancaster County W Sd (sc2920001)94/100Past total coliform bacteria violation on record
- 33Powdersville District (sc0420002)94/100No PFAS detected; lead 5 µg/L
- 34Clemson City (sc3910004)94/100No PFAS detected; lead 5 µg/L
- 35Blue Ridge (sc2320003)90/100No PFAS detected; lead 7 µg/L
- 36Gilbert Summit Wd90/100Past combined radium-226/228 violation on record
- 37Hammond W/D (sc0420007)86/100No PFAS detected; lead 11 µg/L
- 38Lancaster City (sc2910001)76/100PFAS detected below EPA limits; lead 3 µg/L
- 39Orangeburg Dpu (sc3810001)73/100PFOS 4.2 ng/L, 1.1× the EPA limit
- 40Goose Creek City (sc0810004)70/100PFOS 4.9 ng/L, 1.2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 41Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007)70/100PFOA 4.7 ng/L, 1.2× the EPA limit
- 42Starr-Iva W/D (sc0420005)70/100PFOA 4.9 ng/L, 1.2× the EPA limit
- 43Breezy Hill W/D (sc0220006)69/100PFOA 4.8 ng/L, 1.2× the EPA limit
- 44Ocean Lakes Ltd (sc2660048)68/100PFOA 5 ng/L, 1.3× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 45Myrtle Beach City (sc2610001)66/100PFOA 5.3 ng/L, 1.3× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 46Hilton Head Psd 166/100PFOS 5.2 ng/L, 1.3× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 47Dcws Ashley Phosphate (sc1820008)65/100PFOS 5.5 ng/L, 1.4× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 48Bjw Sa (sc0720003)64/100PFOA 5.6 ng/L, 1.4× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 49Camden City (sc2810001)64/100PFOA 5.2 ng/L, 1.3× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 50Union City (sc4410001)62/100PFOS 6.1 ng/L, 1.5× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 51Cayce City (sc3210003)61/100PFOS 6.3 ng/L, 1.6× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 52Lexington59/100PFOS 5.7 ng/L, 1.4× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 53Florence City (sc2110001)56/100PFOS 6.7 ng/L, 1.7× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 54Charleston (sc1010001)55/100PFOS 6.5 ng/L, 1.6× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 55Bcwsa Sangaree W D55/100PFOS 7.1 ng/L, 1.8× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 56Joint WSC (sc3220003)55/100PFOS 6.2 ng/L, 1.6× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 57Bcwsa East Cooper (sc0820009)54/100PFOS 7.1 ng/L, 1.8× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 58Gsw Sa (sc2620004)50/100PFOS 11.5 ng/L, 3× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 59Dcwa Knightsville (sc1820001)50/100PFOS 8.1 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 60Gaffney Bpw (sc1110001)50/100PFOA 18 ng/L, 5× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 61Conway Rural (sc2620001)50/100PFOA 10.9 ng/L, 3× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 62Newberry W Sa (sc3620002)50/100PFOS 8.1 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 63Summerville Cpw (sc1810003)49/100PFOS 8.1 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 64Conway City (sc2610008)49/100PFOA 8.5 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 65Mt Pleasant48/100PFOS 8.4 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 66Laurens County W S Comm (sc3020001)48/100PFOS 8.7 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 67N Myrtle Beach City (sc2610011)48/100PFOS 10 ng/L, 3× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 68Greenwood Cpw47/100PFOS 7.6 ng/L, 1.9× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 69West Columbia City (sc3210004)46/100PFOS 7.9 ng/L, 2.0× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 70Lugoff Elgin (sc2820001)46/100PFOS 9.3 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 71Columbia City (sc4010001)44/100PFOS 8.6 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 72Gcwsd Waccamaw Neck (sc2220010)41/100PFOA 9.5 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
- 73Winnsboro34/100PFOS 32.8 ng/L, 8× the EPA limit
Ranked by PurityMap's Purity Score, highest first. The score is computed only from contaminants measured in the published EPA record, so this ranks the record, not which city's water is safest. How the score works.
PFAS in South Carolina tap water
In EPA's 2024 UCMR 5 testing, 35 cities of 73 had a regulated PFAS (PFOA, PFOS or PFHxS) above the new federal limit, and PFAS were detected at any level in 36.
- WinnsboroPFOS 32.8 ng/L · limit 4
- Gaffney Bpw (sc1110001)PFOA 18 ng/L · limit 4
- Gsw Sa (sc2620004)PFOS 11.5 ng/L · limit 4
- Conway Rural (sc2620001)PFOA 10.9 ng/L · limit 4
- N Myrtle Beach City (sc2610011)PFOS 10 ng/L · limit 4
- Gcwsd Waccamaw Neck (sc2220010)PFOA 9.5 ng/L · limit 4
- Lugoff Elgin (sc2820001)PFOS 9.3 ng/L · limit 4
- Laurens County W S Comm (sc3020001)PFOS 8.7 ng/L · limit 4
Lead in South Carolina tap water
Utilities report lead as the 90th-percentile result from sampled home taps. 50 of 73 South Carolina cities reported a value above zero, and 0 cities were above the 15 µg/L federal action level. Lead usually enters water from a building's own pipes, so a test at your tap is the only way to know what you drink.
South Carolina counties
Largest water systems in South CarolinaOrdered by population served. Each links to the city report built from that system's records.
- Greenville (sc2310001)GREENVILLE WATER (SC2310001) · 426,057 people served100/100
- Columbia City (sc4010001)COLUMBIA CITY OF (SC4010001) · 354,068 people served44/100
- Charleston (sc1010001)CHARLESTON WATER SYSTEM (SC1010001) · 327,422 people served55/100
- Gsw Sa (sc2620004)GSW&SA (SC2620004) · 252,840 people served50/100
- SpartanburgSPARTANBURG WATER SYSTEM (SC4210001) · 166,364 people served100/100
- Spartanburg (sc4210001)SPARTANBURG WATER SYSTEM (SC4210001) · 166,364 people served100/100
- Bjw Sa (sc0720003)BJW&SA (SC0720003) · 164,829 people served64/100
- Bcwsa Sangaree W DBCWSA SANGAREE W/D (0820002) · 95,345 people served55/100
- Mt PleasantMT PLEASANT WATER WORKS (1010002) · 91,500 people served48/100
- Rock HillROCK HILL CITY OF (SC4610002) · 89,850 people served98/100
What you can do next
Start with your supplier
State patterns cannot identify what reaches a specific address. Resolve your public water system before choosing treatment.
Find the system behind your tapMatch treatment to evidence
A filter is useful only when its certified claim covers the contaminant and level in your local record.
Compare treatment technologiesFilters for what’s on record in South Carolina
Matched to contaminant categories in this published record. Confirm the specific NSF/ANSI listing before you buy; recommendations follow the findings, and as an Amazon Associate PurityMap earns from qualifying purchases.
Best for a cheap, no-tools way to reduce lead and chlorine at a single faucet.
Read the analysis →Best when PFAS, lead, arsenic, nitrate, or fluoride is detected and you want the broadest reduction at a single tap.
Read the analysis →Best when chlorine taste/odor or disinfection by-products are the concern at the kitchen tap, with lead reduction on certified models.
Read the analysis →Best for a low-cost, no-install way to reduce lead and improve taste for drinking water.
Read the analysis →Follow South Carolina water records
Get South Carolina updates
We'll email you when South Carolina records change, such as new PFAS or lead results.
Double opt-in: we email a confirmation link. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.
Frequently asked questions
How does South Carolina tap water compare across cities?
PurityMap ranks 73 cities in South Carolina by their Purity Score, computed only from contaminants measured in the published EPA record. Greenville (sc2310001) has the highest published score (100/100). The ranking compares the records, not which city's water is safest, and your own tap can differ with household plumbing.
How many South Carolina cities have PFAS above the federal limit?
35 cities of 73 had at least one regulated PFAS (PFOA, PFOS or PFHxS) measured above the 2024 federal limit in EPA's UCMR 5 testing, including Winnsboro (PFOS 32.8 ng/L), Gaffney Bpw (sc1110001) (PFOA 18 ng/L), Gsw Sa (sc2620004) (PFOS 11.5 ng/L). PFAS were detected at any level in 36.
Is there lead in South Carolina tap water?
Utilities report lead as a 90th-percentile result from home taps. 50 of 73 South Carolina cities reported a value above zero, and none was above the 15 µg/L federal action level. Lead usually comes from a building's own pipes and fixtures, so only a test at your tap tells you what you drink.
Have South Carolina water systems had drinking-water violations?
5 cities in South Carolina have a health-based violation in the federal SDWIS record within about the last ten years. Each city report lists the contaminant, year and whether it was resolved.
Limits, sources and corrections
A statewide page cannot tell you what reaches a specific address. Water quality varies by supplier, sampling period and household plumbing; open a city report for the evidence behind a local result.
Sources: EPA UCMR 5 (PFAS, 2024), SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results and health-based violations, and utility Consumer Confidence Reports where on file. Every city report links its dated source records.
Updated 2026-09-16. How PurityMap analyzes water data · Report an error