2026 WATER QUALITY RECORDS
Oregon Water Quality: 66 Cities Ranked by the Records
Water quality across 66 cities in Oregon, drawn from EPA drinking-water records. Each city page shows the measured contaminants and a reproducible Purity Score.
- city reports ranked
- 66
- cities with a past health-based violation
- 0
- cities with PFAS above the federal limit
- 6
- cities with lead above the action level
- 0
Oregon cities ranked by the records
66 cities, highest Purity Score first
- 1Medford100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 2Medford Commission100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 3Hillsboro100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 4Beaverton100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 5Albany100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 6Lake Oswego100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 7Redmond100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 8Grants Pass100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 9Roseburg100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 10Cornelius100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 11La Grande100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 12Silverton100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 13Baker City100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 14Sweet Home100/100No PFAS detected; lead 0 µg/L
- 15Tigard99/100No PFAS detected; lead 0.85 µg/L
- 16Central Point99/100No PFAS detected; lead 0.67 µg/L
- 17Dalles99/100No PFAS detected; lead 0.8 µg/L
- 18Salem98/100No PFAS detected; lead 2 µg/L
- 19Corvallis98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.4 µg/L
- 20Mcminnville Light98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.3 µg/L
- 21Oregon City98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.84 µg/L
- 22Clackamas River98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.73 µg/L
- 23West Linn98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.84 µg/L
- 24Ashland98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.61 µg/L
- 25Lincoln City98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.4 µg/L
- 26Clackamas River - Clairmont98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.99 µg/L
- 27Sherwood98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.3 µg/L
- 28St. Helens98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.03 µg/L
- 29Deschutes Valley Dist98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.1 µg/L
- 30Monmouth98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.6 µg/L
- 31Prineville98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.9 µg/L
- 32Molalla98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.26 µg/L
- 33Astoria98/100No PFAS detected; lead 1.56 µg/L
- 34Newberg97/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.32 µg/L
- 35Canby97/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.1 µg/L
- 36Ontario97/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.07 µg/L
- 37Newport97/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.1 µg/L
- 38Oak Lodge96/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.67 µg/L
- 39Forest Grove96/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.9 µg/L
- 40Troutdale96/100No PFAS detected; lead 2.5 µg/L
- 41Gladstone96/100No PFAS detected; lead 3.3 µg/L
- 42Independence96/100No PFAS detected; lead 3 µg/L
- 43Gresham95/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.2 µg/L
- 44Lebanon95/100No PFAS detected; lead 3.69 µg/L
- 45Dallas95/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.3 µg/L
- 46Portland Bureau94/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.89 µg/L
- 47Tualatin Valley District94/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.5 µg/L
- 48Eugene94/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.5 µg/L
- 49Eugene Electric Board94/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.5 µg/L
- 50Rockwood PUD94/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.6 µg/L
- 51Coos Bay North Bend Wtr Brd94/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.97 µg/L
- 52Tualatin94/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.93 µg/L
- 53Suburban East Salem Wd94/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.5 µg/L
- 54West Slope District94/100No PFAS detected; lead 4.89 µg/L
- 55Keizer92/100PFAS detected below EPA limits; lead 0 µg/L
- 56Woodburn90/100No PFAS detected; lead 7.5 µg/L
- 57Wilsonville90/100No PFAS detected; lead 7.6 µg/L
- 58Cottage Grove90/100No PFAS detected; lead 8 µg/L
- 59Pendleton87/100PFAS detected below EPA limits; lead 2.5 µg/L
- 60Sandy82/100No PFAS detected; lead 13 µg/L
- 61Springfield Board70/100PFOA 4.1 ng/L, 1.0× the EPA limit
- 62Sunrise69/100PFOS 4.3 ng/L, 1.1× the EPA limit
- 63Milwaukie56/100PFOS 7 ng/L, 1.8× the EPA limit
- 64Bend51/100PFOA 7.9 ng/L, 2.0× the EPA limit
- 65Klamath Falls50/100PFOS 9.5 ng/L, 2× the EPA limit
- 66Hermiston46/100PFOS 12 ng/L, 3× the EPA limit (+1 more PFAS above)
Ranked by PurityMap's Purity Score, highest first. The score is computed only from contaminants measured in the published EPA record, so this ranks the record, not which city's water is safest. How the score works.
PFAS in Oregon tap water
In EPA's 2024 UCMR 5 testing, 6 cities of 66 had a regulated PFAS (PFOA, PFOS or PFHxS) above the new federal limit, and PFAS were detected at any level in 8.
- HermistonPFOS 12 ng/L · limit 4
- Klamath FallsPFOS 9.5 ng/L · limit 4
- BendPFOA 7.9 ng/L · limit 4
- MilwaukiePFOS 7 ng/L · limit 4
- SunrisePFOS 4.3 ng/L · limit 4
- Springfield BoardPFOA 4.1 ng/L · limit 4
Lead in Oregon tap water
Utilities report lead as the 90th-percentile result from sampled home taps. 48 of 66 Oregon cities reported a value above zero, and 0 cities were above the 15 µg/L federal action level. Lead usually enters water from a building's own pipes, so a test at your tap is the only way to know what you drink.
Oregon counties
Largest water systems in OregonOrdered by population served. Each links to the city report built from that system's records.
- Portland BureauPORTLAND WATER BUREAU · 666,200 people served94/100
- Tualatin Valley DistrictTUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT · 224,600 people served94/100
- SalemSALEM PUBLIC WORKS · 199,820 people served98/100
- EugeneEUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD · 176,000 people served94/100
- Eugene Electric BoardEUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD · 176,000 people served94/100
- MedfordMEDFORD WATER COMMISSION · 106,068 people served100/100
- Medford CommissionMEDFORD WATER COMMISSION · 106,068 people served100/100
- HillsboroHILLSBORO, CITY OF · 92,632 people served100/100
- BeavertonBEAVERTON, CITY OF · 88,045 people served100/100
- BendBEND, CITY OF · 77,704 people served51/100
What you can do next
Start with your supplier
State patterns cannot identify what reaches a specific address. Resolve your public water system before choosing treatment.
Find the system behind your tapMatch treatment to evidence
A filter is useful only when its certified claim covers the contaminant and level in your local record.
Compare treatment technologiesFilters for what’s on record in Oregon
Matched to contaminant categories in this published record. Confirm the specific NSF/ANSI listing before you buy; recommendations follow the findings, and as an Amazon Associate PurityMap earns from qualifying purchases.
Best for a cheap, no-tools way to reduce lead and chlorine at a single faucet.
Read the analysis →Best when PFAS, lead, arsenic, nitrate, or fluoride is detected and you want the broadest reduction at a single tap.
Read the analysis →Best when chlorine taste/odor or disinfection by-products are the concern at the kitchen tap, with lead reduction on certified models.
Read the analysis →Best for a low-cost, no-install way to reduce lead and improve taste for drinking water.
Read the analysis →Follow Oregon water records
Get Oregon updates
We'll email you when Oregon records change, such as new PFAS or lead results.
Double opt-in: we email a confirmation link. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.
Frequently asked questions
How does Oregon tap water compare across cities?
PurityMap ranks 66 cities in Oregon by their Purity Score, computed only from contaminants measured in the published EPA record. Medford has the highest published score (100/100). The ranking compares the records, not which city's water is safest, and your own tap can differ with household plumbing.
How many Oregon cities have PFAS above the federal limit?
6 cities of 66 had at least one regulated PFAS (PFOA, PFOS or PFHxS) measured above the 2024 federal limit in EPA's UCMR 5 testing, including Hermiston (PFOS 12 ng/L), Klamath Falls (PFOS 9.5 ng/L), Bend (PFOA 7.9 ng/L). PFAS were detected at any level in 8.
Is there lead in Oregon tap water?
Utilities report lead as a 90th-percentile result from home taps. 48 of 66 Oregon cities reported a value above zero, and none was above the 15 µg/L federal action level. Lead usually comes from a building's own pipes and fixtures, so only a test at your tap tells you what you drink.
Limits, sources and corrections
A statewide page cannot tell you what reaches a specific address. Water quality varies by supplier, sampling period and household plumbing; open a city report for the evidence behind a local result.
Sources: EPA UCMR 5 (PFAS, 2024), SDWIS Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results and health-based violations, and utility Consumer Confidence Reports where on file. Every city report links its dated source records.
Updated 2026-09-16. How PurityMap analyzes water data · Report an error